Did you create a ticket for this at bugs.webkit.org? That would be helpful.

Did you create a ticket for this at bugs.webkit.org? That would be helpful.

No, because as far as I understood Safari is kind of spec conform. So I opened:
whatwg/html#7497

Since Safari conforms to the current spec, a note about a bug is not warranted.

@HolgerJeromin You are welcome to open an issue at bugs.webkit.org anyway. Or rather feedbackassistant.apple.com is better, since this is an OS-level thing.

Since Safari conforms to the current spec, a note about a bug is not warranted.

IMO a note on caniuse is useful if there is behavior which is different in some browsers to warn developers.

I do not expect any useful reaction on a safari/webkit issue tracker.
IMO first the spec should fully define what we expect.

This issue is asking for a note to be added about Safari support, making it seem like it has a bug because it follows the spec, and the OP believes the spec should be different than it is? Can we please close this issue.

This issue is asking for a note to be added about Safari support, making it seem like it has a bug because it follows the spec, and the OP believes the spec should be different than it is?

IMO this condense to the question:
What warrants a "note" in the caniuse data? Only bugs or also other hints regarding the feature?

The repo has this documentation:
https://github.com/Fyrd/caniuse/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#supported-changes

notes — Notes on feature support, often to explain what partial support refers to

But the maintainer of this repo may do what ever they like.
I wanted to warn other devs that the feature could be useless for them (as it is for us).